Data Element
Submitted By: Shelly Spiro / Pharmacy HIT Collaborative
Data Element Information
Data Element Description This is a record indicating that a patient may be taking a medication now, has taken the medication in the past, or will be taking the medication in the future. The source for this information can be the patient, significant other (such as a family member or spouse), or a clinician. A common scenario where this information is captured is during the history taking process during a patient visit or stay. A medication statement is not a part of the prescribe->dispense->administer sequence, but is a report that such a sequence (or at least a part of it) did take place, resulting in a belief that the patient has received a particular medication. It may be used to construct a patients 'Current Medications' list. https://www.hl7.org/fhir/medicationstatement.html
Rationale for Separate Consideration These foundational FHIR resources are part of a suite of resources and should all be under USCDI Medication as they are needed for eCare Plans, including but not limited to the Pharmacist eCare Plan.
Use Case Description(s)
Use Case Description These foundational FHIR resources are part of a suite of resources and should all be under USCDI Medication as they are needed for eCare Plans, including but not limited to the Pharmacist eCare Plan.
Estimate the breadth of applicability of the use case(s) for this data element At least 21 pharmacy system vendors are FHIR enabled and are created millions of Pharmacist eCare Plans throughout the US.
Healthcare Aims
  • Improving patient experience of care (quality and/or satisfaction)
  • Improving the health of populations
  • Improving provider experience of care
Maturity of Use and Technical Specifications for Data Element
Applicable Standard(s) RxNorm and SNOMED CT
Additional Specifications https://www.hl7.org/fhir/medications-module.html
Current Use This data element has been used at scale between multiple different production environments to support the majority of anticipated stakeholders
Supporting Artifacts https://www.ecareplaninitiative.com/
https://216b2f95-65cb-4e7e-bd94-a9b066b0a193.filesusr.com/ugd/b303f5_a66df3115abd40a58659bae8f51b4aad.pdf
Extent of exchange 5 or more. This data element has been tested at scale between multiple different production environments to support the majority of anticipated stakeholders.
Potential Challenges
Restrictions on Standardization (e.g. proprietary code) MedicationKnowledge resource is draft
Restrictions on Use (e.g. licensing, user fees) None known.
Privacy and Security Concerns None known.
Estimate of Overall Burden Burden is on the EHR and pharmacy system vendors to implement.
ASTP Evaluation Details
Each submitted Data Element has been evaluated based on the following criteria. The overall Level classification is a composite of the maturity based on these individual criteria. This information can be used to identify areas that require additional work to raise the overall classification level and consideration for inclusion in future versions of USCDI
Criterion #1
Maturity - Current Standards		 Level 2 - Data element is represented by a terminology standard or SDO-balloted technical specification or implementation guide.
Criterion #2
Maturity - Current Use 		Level 1 - Data element is captured, stored, or accessed in at least one production EHR or HIT module.
Criterion #3
Maturity - Current Exchange		 Level 2 - Data element is electronically exchanged between more than two production EHRs or other HIT modules of different developers using available interoperability standards.
Criterion #4
Use Case(s) - Breadth of Applicability		 Level 2 - Use cases apply to most care settings or specialties.

Comment

Submitted by pwilson@ncpdp.org on

NCPDP Comment

NCPDP recommends replacing the data element definition from, “Statement of whether a medication has been consumed according to instructions” to, “Medication is consumed according to instructions as captured by the provider, pharmacist or clinician.”

Submitted by pwilson@ncpdp.org on

NCPDP Comments on USCDI draft v5

NCPDP recommends replacing the data element definition to “Medication is consumed according to instructions as captured by the provider, pharmacist or clinician” instead of “Statement of whether a medication has been consumed according to instructions”.

Submitted by kelly.clarke@j… on

Comment

Highly support and agree with the addition of this new data element. This will ensure patient treatment plan adherence and patient care outcomes.

Submitted by pwilson@ncpdp.org on

NCPDP Comment

NCPDP recommends updating the data element definition to “Medication is consumed according to instructions as captured by the provider, pharmacist or clinician”. Examples include but are not limited to taking as directed, taking not as directed, and not taking.

Submitted by hswmin on

THIA Comment on Medications: Medication Adherence

The Texas Health Informatics Alliance (THIA) Policy and Standards Working Group supports the proposal for medication adherence; however, we recognize that it is going to take a lot of time and effort to properly establish. Associated/relevant vocabulary should be clearly defined (i.e. taking as directed, not taking as directed, not taking). Medication adherence calculations should be accurate, timely, and transparent.

Medication adherence is now a metric for Primary Care Providers (PCPs). PCPs are measured by the Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services (CMS, which affects value-based metric scores through accountable care organizations (ACOs).

How medication adherence is getting calculated should be clear. Currently, medication adherence is claims-based and it is difficult to measure within ACOs. If one’s ACO is going to utilize a certain form/method to measure medication adherence, providers want it to be accurate and timely.

Capturing the costs of medication adherence is difficult. Medications can be expensive and it is hard to know where patients get their medications from and/or if they use services, such as GoodRx.

Capturing the cadence of medication adherence is difficult. Refills count if one is done within a 6-month interval. If a patient falls off compliance, it takes about 18 months post-refill to get them back onto compliance. Notably, the patient’s physician gets dinged throughout the 18 months of “non-compliance”.

Log in or register to post comments

FormGuide

Help

1. Optional: Background Text / Cover Letter

The "Optional Background Text / Cover Letter" field provides space for additional context or introductory information related to your comment.

If you wish to provide context, explanation, or an introduction to your comment, enter this information in the field labeled "Optional Background Text / Cover Letter." This is entirely optional and is most useful when submitting multiple related comments or when additional background would help reviewers understand your feedback.

If you are only commenting on a single data class or element, you may leave this field blank.

2. Select the Data Class

To specify which data class your comment addresses:

  1. In the "Data Class" drop-down menu, select the appropriate data class you want to comment on.
  2. If you are providing a general comment that is not specific to a data element, select "General" from the options. Comments with this designation will be displayed on the USCDI landing page.
  3. Note that the Data Class field will automatically populate based on your current location in the platform:
    1. If you are on a data class page, the field will be set to that specific data class
    2. If you are on a data element page, the corresponding data class will be pre-selected
       

3. Select the Data Element

To specify which data element your comment addresses:

  1. In the "Data Element" drop-down menu, select the specific data element you want to comment on.
  2. The drop-down menu will display only the elements available under the data class you selected in the previous step.
  3. You can use the search function within the drop-down to quickly locate a specific data element.
  4. If you are commenting on the data class itself rather than a specific element, you may leave this field blank.

Note: Comments on a specific data element will appear on the respective data element page, while comments on a data class (without a specific element selected) will appear on the landing page for that data class.
 

Data Class and Data Element

Fig 1 The "Data Class" and "Data Element" dropdown menus allow users to specify the exact content they wish to comment on.

4. Optional: Propose New Data Class or Element

If you cannot find the appropriate data class or element for your comment:

  1. Instead of clicking the "Comment On An Existing Data Class Or Element" button, click the adjacent button labeled "Propose a New Data Class or Data Element."
  2. This will redirect you to the ONDEC (ONC New Data Element and Class) Submission System.
  3. In the ONDEC system, follow the provided instructions to submit your proposal for a new data class or element.
  4. Once your proposal is submitted through ONDEC, it will be reviewed separately from the commenting process.
Propose New Data Class or Element

Fig 2 The "Propose a New Data Class or Data Element" button redirects users to the ONDEC Submission System for proposing new data elements not currently available in the system.

5. Complete the Comment Form

Fill out the required fields in the comment form:

Subject: Enter a brief, descriptive title that summarizes your comment. This helps reviewers quickly understand the nature of your feedback.

Comment: In this field, provide the full details of your comment or feedback. Be as clear and specific as possible about your suggestions, concerns, or observations. Include any relevant details that support your position.

6. Optional: Add Additional Comments

If you need to comment on multiple data classes or elements:

  1. After completing your first comment, click the link labeled "Comment on another data element" at the bottom of the form.
  2. A new comment section will appear, allowing you to enter details for your additional comment.
  3. For each additional comment, you must select the appropriate data class and data element from the drop-down menus.
  4. Complete the Subject and Comment fields for your additional comment.
  5. Repeat this process for each additional comment you wish to submit.

Fig 3 The "Comment on another data element" link enables users to create multiple comments addressing different elements within a single submission.

7. Optional: Upload Supporting Files

The platform allows you to upload supporting documentation to enhance your comment:

  • Locate the "File Upload" section at the bottom of the comment form.
  • Click to upload any files (such as PDFs or documents) that provide additional context, evidence, or clarification for your comment.

Important: If you have already entered your comments using the form fields, there is no need to upload duplicate content in PDF format. The file upload feature is intended for supplementary materials only. Please avoid uploading files that contain the same information already provided in your comment text.

Upload Supporting Files

Fig 4 The "File Upload" section permits users to attach supporting documentation that supplements their written comments.

8. Optional: Save and Exit

If you need to pause your work and return to complete your comment later:

  1. Click the "Save and Exit" button at the bottom of the form.
  2. Your comment will be saved as a draft that you can access and complete later.
  3. When you return to the platform, you will see a red triangle with an exclamation mark next to the “Return to saved Comment” button, indicating that you have saved comments in draft status.
  4. Click this button to continue working on your draft.
  5. You will be taken to a review page where you can:
    1. Select "Submit Comment" to officially submit your feedback.
    2. Click "Edit" to return to the comment form and make changes
    3. Select "Discard Draft" to delete the saved draft and start fresh

Fig 5 A red triangle with exclamation mark indicator appears next to the “Return to saved Comment” button when draft comments are saved in the system.

9. Review and Submit

Once you have completed your comment:

  1. Click the "Review and Submit" button at the bottom of the form.
  2. This will take you to a review screen displaying your comment(s) in full.
  3. Review all information for accuracy and completeness.
  4. On this review screen, you have three options: 
    1. Click "Submit Comment" to officially submit your feedback
    2. Click "Edit" to return to the comment form and make changes
    3. Click "Discard Draft" to delete the comment and start fresh
  5. The review screen also includes a "Print" button that allows you to create a printed copy of your comments for your records. 
  6. If you choose to submit, your comment will be recorded in the system and made available for review by the appropriate stakeholders.
Review and Submit

Fig 6 The review screen allows users to verify comment content and make any necessary modifications before final submission.

USCDI Comments

Close

Add a New Comment

Review comment and Submit

Edit
Comment #1