Type | Standard / Implementation Specification | Standards Process Maturity | Implementation Maturity | Adoption Level | Federally required | Cost | Test Tool Availability |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Standard for observations
|
Final
|
Production
|
No
|
Free
|
N/A
|
||
Standard for observation values
|
Final
|
Production
|
No
|
Free
|
N/A
|
Limitations, Dependencies, and Preconditions for Consideration |
Applicable Value Set(s) and Starter Set(s)
|
---|---|
|
|
Comment
Submitted by cmcdonald on
May be underestimating the…
May be underestimating the adoption level. Vital signs are nursing variables and they are required by Meaningful Use. Other nursing variables like Braden scores are also common - so maybe two bubbles.
Submitted by dvreeman on
Regenstrief - Comment
We concur with the recommended standards here (LOINC and SNOMED CT). The second sentence in Limitations, Dependencies, and Preconditions for Consideration should be amended because it only applies to SNOMED: Concepts for observation values from SNOMED CT should generally be chosen from two axes: Clinical finding and Situation with explicit context.
Submitted by gdixon on
Question / Answer Pairs
Question / Answer pairs are valuable, supporting context of the assessment. The assessment should not be limited to Q/A pairs. Full question with answer must be included in communication.
We strongly approve of Nursing practice being included in ISA.
Submitted by andersol on
Agree with use of name/value pairs
The Joint Commission agrees with the use of name/value pairs to represent clinical assessments. This is the current structure used in electronic clinical quality measures (eCQMs).
Submitted by gldickinson on
Preserving Clinical Context
General Comments:
USCDI specifies lots of clinical data classes and data elements
It is crucial to consider, determine and resolve how clinical content and context are bound together and preserved in USCDI. The ultimate end user (often a clinician) must be able to readily discern context and inter-relationships – otherwise USCDI places an undue (and often unresolvable) burden on this user. Only the source EHR/HIT system can structure clinical content and context properly. Once data is stuffed into the USCDI framework and related exchange artifact (e.g., FHIR resources) this opportunity is forever lost.