Type | Standard / Implementation Specification | Standards Process Maturity | Implementation Maturity | Adoption Level | Federally required | Cost | Test Tool Availability |
---|
Limitations, Dependencies, and Preconditions for Consideration |
Applicable Value Set(s) and Starter Set(s)
|
---|---|
|
LOINC® 2.63 codes supporting SCRIPT 2017071 <Observation> segment: |
Comment
Submitted by pwilson@ncpdp.org on
NCPDP Comment
Submitted by shellyspiro on
Pharmacy HIT Collaborative (PHIT) comment
PHIT supports NCPDP’s recommendation to update Structured and Codified Sig Format Implementation Guide Version 2.1 to Structured and Codified Sig Format Implementation Guide Version 2.2.
Submitted by pwilson@ncpdp.org on
NCPDP Comments
NCPDP SCRIPT Standards, Implementation Guide, Version 2017071 update adoption level to 3.
Submitted by alsmd1023 on
Requirement for weight and height for prescriptions
Except for chemotherapeutic agents and a very few other medications, a patient's height is not necessary to determine medication dosing. Medications such as eye drops, ear drops, skin creams, and inhaled medications (bronchodilators, inhaled steroids, etc.) do not require weights at all. These categories should be exempted from requiring height and weight data on prescriptions as refills and even initial prescriptions are often sent in or called in without the child being actually seen in the office. ("Pink Eye" does not always need an office visit!) Imagine how disruptive it would be if you had to leave work, pick up a child from school or daycare, and come to the pediatrician's office just to get an update weight and height for your eye drops or albuterol refill! Moreover, as telemedicine becomes more prevalent, patients may be evaluated by a physician and prescriptions sent in without there being an actual physical visit to an office where updated heights and weights are obtained. This is especially true for behavioral health conditions such as ADHD and anxiety/depression. Again, medications would be refilled without a patient actually being present for a new height and weight. (These medications are not particularly dosed by weight anyway.)
As a practical matter, most pediatricians will not send in prescriptions for patients they have not seen in over a year, but for those patients who are current, as long as we can use the most recent measurements we have on-file, this policy should be workable--especially if you eliminate the height requirement and exempt the categories noted above.
Alan L. Schwartz, M.D.; Pediatrician,
Indianapolis, IN
Submitted by pwilson@ncpdp.org on
NCPDP Comment
- Update the following:
Type-Implementation Specification
Standard Implementation/Specification- NCPDP SCRIPT Standard, Implementation Guide, Version 2017071
Implementation Maturity- Production (effective 1/1/2020)
Test Tool Availability - Yes
Test Tool Link: https://tools.ncpdp.org/erx/#/home
Submitted by pwilson@ncpdp.org on
NCPDP Comment
- Add the following:
- Observation Element in NewRx Transaction
Type-Implementation Specification
Standard Implementation/Specification- NCPDP SCRIPT Standard, Implementation Guide, Version 2017071
Standards Process Maturity – Final
Implementation Maturity- Pilot
Adoption Level – 1
Federally Required – No
Cost – $
Test Tool Availability – Yes
Submitted by shellyspiro on
Pharmacy HIT Collaborative's Comments on ONC's Proposed 2018 ISA
The Pharmacy HIT Collaborative supports the use of Structured Codified Sig Format Implementation Guide Version 2.1. The Collaborative also supports the move to NCPDP SCRIPT Version 2017071 as soon as participants can reasonably be ready to implement such a change.
Submitted by pwilson@ncpdp.org on
NCPDP Comment
NCPDP recommends removing NCPDP SCRIPT Standard, Implementation Guide, Version 2022011, as this version was never implemented. NCPDP SCRIPT Standard Implementation Guide, Version 2023011 is the next version named by ASTP/ONC and Medicare. Federally required should be changed to a Yes for the NCPDP SCRIPT Standard Implementation Guide, Version 2023011.