Submitted by ravi.kafle@doh… on
Additional values in the value set
* = New values being proposed
Data used to categorize individuals for identification, records matching, and other purposes.
Data Element |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gender Identity
Description
A person’s internal sense of being a man, woman, both, or neither. Applicable Vocabulary Standard(s) Applicable Standards (*Please confirm or update this field for the new USCDI version*)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Submitted by ravi.kafle@doh… on
* = New values being proposed
Submitted by maria.michaels… on
MedMorph supports the addition of the Gender Identity element and believes it should be promoted to V2. Gender Identity is important for measuring the impact of disease and outcomes across populations. It is also beneficial in the Healthcare Survey domain since it is used to guide the provider and staff about how to interact with the patient. Also, HL7 has just completed an informative ballot: "Gender Harmony - Modeling Sex and Gender Representation, Release 1".
Submitted by rmcclure on
While I have some concerns with the sentiments noted in the "Rationale for Separate Consideration" I absolutely agree with the summary consideration that Gender Identity is a critical piece of information about people in the course of clinical care. It is distinct from other representations of sex-oriented identities, such as whatever administrative sex might be. It should be noted that Gender Identity is something that is expressed by an individual, is not assigned by any other entity (such as a parent.) Gender Identity is not something that should be used as a surrogate for physiologic sex-oriented clinical observations; instead I would like to see a separate data element that we like to call Sex For Clinical Use (SFCU). Please note that Gender Identity is NOT the element to capture information indicating if a person has gone through a transgender process, which would be best captured via clinical observations (that could properly be masked if needed.) Many transgender individuals will properly indicate Male or Female as their gender identity.
Submitted by nedragarrett_CDC on
We've reviewed and submitted feedback on the submission we've put forward for Patient Gender Identity, and we believe the information provided differs from the submission here, which has been referenced when told we submitted a duplicate. We believe our submission should be revisited as it differs in some areas to the submission seen here.
This is the data element description from the submission we've put forth:
The gender the patient identifies with. The Patient's gender identity is used as guidance (e.g. for staff) about how to interact with the patient.
Submitted by zbarber on
The NY eHealth Collaborative (NYeC) supports including Gender Identity in the USCDI v2 due to its widespread use and clinical value for LGBTQIA individuals. We suggest revising the element description to reference the Human Rights Campaign (HRC) definition: "One's innermost concept of self as male, female, a blend of both or neither – how individuals perceive themselves and what they call themselves. One's gender identity can be the same or different from their sex assigned at birth."
Submitted by ravi.kafle@doh… on
Additional values in the value set
Gender identity defined in USCDI v2 does not represent all different gender identities expressed by the community as a whole. There are additional gender identities that could not be categorized in any of the values existing in the current version. For example – there are community members identifying themselves as ‘Transgender’ rather than either ‘Male Transgender’ or ‘Female Transgender’. Similarly, there are additional categories that are presently represented by ‘other’ which accurately represents additional gender identities, as follows: