Submitted by mturchioe on
ANI's comment on USCDI v6: Portable Medical Order
The Alliance for Nursing Informatics (ANI) strongly supports this addition. However, we recommend greater specificity in both the use cases and the data model implications. For example, consider a scenario where a patient has a DNR order recorded in their primary care provider’s or nursing home’s EHR, but it is unknown to EMS responders or clinicians at a hospital during a 911 call. To support real-world interoperability, we suggest clarifying how this data element should be modeled (binary or requiring metadata such as type of order, issuing clinician, date, jurisdiction), specific expectations for accessibility (queryable in real-time by EMS even if outside the health system), and guidance for ensuring exchangeability across settings.
Please see previously submitted ANI comments for additional recommendations.
Submitted by rdillaire on
CMS-CCSQ Supports Portable Medical Order's inclusion in USCDI v6
Comment: CMS CCSQ supports the inclusion of Portable Medical Order in USCDI Version 6.