Submitted by rdillaire on
CMS-CCSQ Support for Care Plan data class for USCDI v6
Data Elements: Care Plan Information, Assessment, Health Concerns, Goals, Interventions, and Outcomes/Evaluation
- Recommendation: Add a Care Plan data class to Final USCDI v6.
- Rationale: We continue to recommend a distinct Care Plan data class with a set of data elements (Care Plan Information, Assessment, Health Concerns, Goals, Interventions, and Outcomes/Evaluation). We define care plan as a shared dynamic longitudinal plan representing all care team members (including patient/caregiver) prioritized concerns, goals, interventions, and evaluation/outcomes across all health and social services settings. It can include a structured package of data elements that are already existing in USCDI. By adding Care Plan as a distinct class in the Final USCDI v6, it would encompass all data elements relevant to patient care planning. We believe Patient Summary and Plan are distinct concepts with patient summary component closely aligning to Clinical Notes data class. We propose repurposing the Patient Summary and Plan data class to the new Care Plan data class. Should this recommendation be adopted, we further recommend that the existing Assessment and Plan of Treatment (v5) data element, currently under the Patient Summary and Plan data class, be included in the new Care Plan data class. Including a Care Plan data class with relevant data elements will improve communication and care coordination across the care teams, improve patient safety and patient experience, and provide access to patient and caregiver-centric data.
Submitted by jay.lyle@jpsys.com on
Care Plan requires more specificity
Having a care plan is an appealing prospect, but the task of providing a care plan raises some fundamental questions. Does this mean a) the provider's text SOAP note, or does it mean b) structured data? If structured, does it mean c) a static set of information that has been signed by a provider, or d) anything planned, as in a 'dynamic' care plan that may change based on rules without the intervention of a central planner? If the latter, what rules define its scope?
Specifying the requirement without addressing these issues will usually result in the adoption of the lowest common denominator, (a), but less consistently than if specified.