USCDI Export for the Public
Classification Level Sort descending | Data Class | Data Class Description | Data Element | Data Element Description | Applicable Standards | Submitter Name | Submitter Organization | Submission Date |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Level 0 | Explanation of Benefit | Health data as reflected in a patient's Explanation of Benefits (EOB) statements, typically derived from claims and other administrative data. |
Line Other Payer Paid Amount | The reduction in the payment amount to reflect the current carrier as a secondary, tertiary, etc, payer. May be multiple occurrences if the current carrier is a tertiary, etc. carrier. |
NUBC, CPT, HCPCS, HIPPS, ICD-9, ICD-10, DRGs, NDC, POS, NCPDP codes, and X12 codes. |
Mark Roberts | Leavitt Partners | |
Level 0 | Explanation of Benefit | Health data as reflected in a patient's Explanation of Benefits (EOB) statements, typically derived from claims and other administrative data. |
Line Patient Deductible | The contracted reimbursable amount for covered medical services or supplies or amount reflecting local methodology for noncontracted providers. |
NUBC, CPT, HCPCS, HIPPS, ICD-9, ICD-10, DRGs, NDC, POS, NCPDP codes, and X12 codes. |
Mark Roberts | Leavitt Partners | |
Level 0 | Explanation of Benefit | Health data as reflected in a patient's Explanation of Benefits (EOB) statements, typically derived from claims and other administrative data. |
Line Amount Paid to Provider | The amount paid to the provider. |
NUBC, CPT, HCPCS, HIPPS, ICD-9, ICD-10, DRGs, NDC, POS, NCPDP codes, and X12 codes. |
Mark Roberts | Leavitt Partners | |
Level 0 | Explanation of Benefit | Health data as reflected in a patient's Explanation of Benefits (EOB) statements, typically derived from claims and other administrative data. |
Line Allowed Amount | The contracted reimbursable amount for covered medical services or supplies or amount reflecting local methodology for noncontracted providers. Allowed amount should not include any COB adjustment. That is, the Allowed amount on a claim should be the same when the Plan is primary or secondary. |
NUBC, CPT, HCPCS, HIPPS, ICD-9, ICD-10, DRGs, NDC, POS, NCPDP codes, and X12 codes. |
Mark Roberts | Leavitt Partners | |
Level 0 | Explanation of Benefit | Health data as reflected in a patient's Explanation of Benefits (EOB) statements, typically derived from claims and other administrative data. |
Drug Cost | Price paid for the drug excluding mfr discounts. It is the sum of the following components:ingredient cost, dispensing fee, sales tax, and vaccine administration fee. |
NUBC, CPT, HCPCS, HIPPS, ICD-9, ICD-10, DRGs, NDC, POS, NCPDP codes, and X12 codes. |
Mark Roberts | Leavitt Partners | |
Level 0 | Explanation of Benefit | Health data as reflected in a patient's Explanation of Benefits (EOB) statements, typically derived from claims and other administrative data. |
Line Amount Paid by Patient | Medical: The amount paid by the member at the point of service. |
NUBC, CPT, HCPCS, HIPPS, ICD-9, ICD-10, DRGs, NDC, POS, NCPDP codes, and X12 codes. |
Mark Roberts | Leavitt Partners | |
Level 0 | Explanation of Benefit | Health data as reflected in a patient's Explanation of Benefits (EOB) statements, typically derived from claims and other administrative data. |
Line Discount Amount | The amount of the discount. |
NUBC, CPT, HCPCS, HIPPS, ICD-9, ICD-10, DRGs, NDC, POS, NCPDP codes, and X12 codes. |
Mark Roberts | Leavitt Partners | |
Level 0 | Explanation of Benefit | Health data as reflected in a patient's Explanation of Benefits (EOB) statements, typically derived from claims and other administrative data. |
Line Payment Amount | The amount sent to the payee from the health plan. This amount is to exclude any member cost sharing. It should include the total of member and provider payments. |
NUBC, CPT, HCPCS, HIPPS, ICD-9, ICD-10, DRGs, NDC, POS, NCPDP codes, and X12 codes. |
Mark Roberts | Leavitt Partners | |
Level 0 | Explanation of Benefit | Health data as reflected in a patient's Explanation of Benefits (EOB) statements, typically derived from claims and other administrative data. |
Line Member Reimbursement | The amount paid to the member. |
NUBC, CPT, HCPCS, HIPPS, ICD-9, ICD-10, DRGs, NDC, POS, NCPDP codes, and X12 codes. |
Mark Roberts | Leavitt Partners | |
Level 0 | Explanation of Benefit | Health data as reflected in a patient's Explanation of Benefits (EOB) statements, typically derived from claims and other administrative data. |
Claim Referring Physician Network Status | Indicates the network status of the referring physician. |
NUBC, CPT, HCPCS, HIPPS, ICD-9, ICD-10, DRGs, NDC, POS, NCPDP codes, and X12 codes. |
Mark Roberts | Leavitt Partners | |
Level 0 | Explanation of Benefit | Health data as reflected in a patient's Explanation of Benefits (EOB) statements, typically derived from claims and other administrative data. |
Line Noncovered Amount | Medical: The portion of the cost of this service that was deemed not eligible by the insurer because the service or member was not covered by the subscriber contract. |
NUBC, CPT, HCPCS, HIPPS, ICD-9, ICD-10, DRGs, NDC, POS, NCPDP codes, and X12 codes. |
Mark Roberts | Leavitt Partners | |
Level 0 | Explanation of Benefit | Health data as reflected in a patient's Explanation of Benefits (EOB) statements, typically derived from claims and other administrative data. |
Payment member explanation | Payment explanation to a member on an EOB |
NUBC, CPT, HCPCS, HIPPS, ICD-9, ICD-10, DRGs, NDC, POS, NCPDP codes, and X12 codes. |
Mark Roberts | Leavitt Partners | |
Level 0 | Explanation of Benefit | Health data as reflected in a patient's Explanation of Benefits (EOB) statements, typically derived from claims and other administrative data. |
Line Payment Denial Code | Reason codes used to interpret the Non-Covered Amount that are provided to the Provider |
NUBC, CPT, HCPCS, HIPPS, ICD-9, ICD-10, DRGs, NDC, POS, NCPDP codes, and X12 codes. |
Mark Roberts | Leavitt Partners | |
Level 0 | Explanation of Benefit | Health data as reflected in a patient's Explanation of Benefits (EOB) statements, typically derived from claims and other administrative data. |
Benefit Payment Status | Indicates the in network or out of network payment status of the claim. |
NUBC, CPT, HCPCS, HIPPS, ICD-9, ICD-10, DRGs, NDC, POS, NCPDP codes, and X12 codes. |
Mark Roberts | Leavitt Partners | |
Level 0 | Cancer Care | Cancer Staging (AJCC TNM) | The AJCC Cancer Staging System describes the severity of an individual's cancer based on the magnitude of the original (primary) tumor as well as on the extent cancer has spread in the body. Understanding the stage of the cancer helps doctors to develop a prognosis and design a treatment plan for individual patients. The AJCC Cancer Staging System classifies cancers by the size and extent of the primary tumor (T), involvement of regional lymph nodes (N), and the presence or absence of distant metastases (M), supplemented in recent years by evidence-based prognostic and predictive factors. There is a T,N,M staging algorithm for cancers of virtually every anatomic site and histology, with the primary exception of pediatric cancers. The three categories—T, N, and M—and the prognostic factors collectively describe, with rare exceptions, the extent of tumor, including local spread, regional nodal involvement, and distant metastasis. It is important to stress that each component (T, N, and M) is referred to as a Category. The term stage is used when T, N, and M and cancer site–specific required prognostic factors are combined. The Criteria for T, N, and M are defined separately for cancers in different anatomic locations and/or for different histologic types. |
SNOMED CT has content related to the AJCC T category under the hierarchy of 385356007 'Tumor stage finding' but it is outdated and inaccurate. SNOMED CT codes do not always make a distinction between clinical and pathological classifications (e.g. cT1 and pT1) and are represented by the same SNOMED CT code 23351008 'T1 category'). SNOMED CT does not have complete T,N,M staging terminology and is an incomplete data set. Most importantly, the SNOMED structure is not a good fit for the AJCC data elements that can change as new editions/versions of the AJCC Cancer Staging System are published. However, the AJCC is planning on submitting the data elements to the National Library of Medicine’s Value Set Authority Center (VSAC), in parallel to the submission to USCDI. The AJCC feels that VSAC would be an appropriate centralized repository for AJCC data elements. This would facilitate EHR systems' use of the data elements that the AJCC develops and maintains. |
Martin Madera | American College of Surgeons | ||
Level 0 | Cancer Care | AJCC T Category | For both Clinical (cT), Pathological (pT) and Neoadjuvant (ycT or ypT), the T Category is defined as the size and/or contiguous extension of the primary tumor. Note: The roles of the size component and the extent of contiguous spread are specifically defined for each cancer site. Primary Tumor (T) Categories: Primary tumor categories have specific notations to describe the existence, size, or extent of the tumor. TX: No information about the T category for the primary tumor, or it is unknown or cannot be assessed T0: No evidence of a primary tumor Tis: Carcinoma in situ T1, T2, T3, or T4: Primary invasive tumor, for which a higher category generally means • an increasing size • an increasing local extension, or • both |
SNOMED CT has content related to the AJCC T category under the hierarchy of 385356007 'Tumor stage finding' but it is outdated and inaccurate. SNOMED CT codes do not always make a distinction between clinical and pathological classifications (e.g. cT1 and pT1) and are represented by the same SNOMED CT code 23351008 'T1 category'). SNOMED CT does not have complete T,N,M staging terminology and is an incomplete data set. Most importantly, the SNOMED structure is not a good fit for the AJCC data elements that can change as new editions/versions of the AJCC Cancer Staging System are published. However, the AJCC is planning on submitting the data elements to the National Library of Medicine’s Value Set Authority Center (VSAC), in parallel to the submission to USCDI. The AJCC feels that VSAC would be an appropriate centralized repository for AJCC data elements. This would facilitate EHR systems' use of the data elements that the AJCC develops and maintains. |
Martin Madera | American College of Surgeons | ||
Level 0 | Explanation of Benefit | Health data as reflected in a patient's Explanation of Benefits (EOB) statements, typically derived from claims and other administrative data. |
Quantity Qualifier Code | The unit of measurement for the drug. (gram, ml, etc.). |
NUBC, CPT, HCPCS, HIPPS, ICD-9, ICD-10, DRGs, NDC, POS, NCPDP codes, and X12 codes. |
Mark Roberts | Leavitt Partners | |
Level 0 | Cancer Care | AJCC N Category | For both Clinical (cN), Pathological (pN) and Neoadjuvant (ycN or ypN), the N Category is defined as Cancer in the regional lymph nodes as defined for each cancer site, including • absence or presence of cancer in regional node(s), and/or • number of positive regional nodes, and/or • involvement of specific regional nodal groups, and/or • size of nodal metastasis or extension through the regional node capsule, and/or • In-transit and satellite metastases, somewhat unique manifestations of nonnodal intralymphatic regional disease, usually found between the primary tumor site and draining nodal basins. Regional Lymph Node (N) Categories Categorizing regional lymph node involvement depends on its existence and extent. NX No information about the N category for the regional lymph nodes, or it is unknown or cannot be assessed N0 No regional lymph node involvement with cancer and for some disease sites, nonnodal regional disease as noted earlier N1, N2, or N3 Evidence of regional node(s) containing cancer, with • an increasing number, and/or • regional nodal group involvement, and/or • size of the nodal metastatic cancer deposit, or • non-nodal regional disease as noted earlier for melanoma and Merkel cell carcinoma, and for colorectal carcinoma |
SNOMED CT has content related to the AJCC T category under the hierarchy of 385356007 'Tumor stage finding' but it is outdated and inaccurate. SNOMED CT codes do not always make a distinction between clinical and pathological classifications (e.g. cT1 and pT1) and are represented by the same SNOMED CT code 23351008 'T1 category'). SNOMED CT does not have complete T,N,M staging terminology and is an incomplete data set. Most importantly, the SNOMED structure is not a good fit for the AJCC data elements that can change as new editions/versions of the AJCC Cancer Staging System are published. However, the AJCC is planning on submitting the data elements to the National Library of Medicine’s Value Set Authority Center (VSAC), in parallel to the submission to USCDI. The AJCC feels that VSAC would be an appropriate centralized repository for AJCC data elements. This would facilitate EHR systems' use of the data elements that the AJCC develops and maintains. |
Martin Madera | American College of Surgeons | ||
Level 0 | Cancer Care | AJCC M Category | For both Clinical (cM) and Pathological (pM) the M Category is defined as the absence or presence of distant metastases in sites and/or organs outside the local tumor area and regional nodes as defined for each cancer site. For some cancer sites, the location and volume or burden of distant metastases are included. Distant Metastasis (M) Categories: The distant metastasis category specifies whether distant metastasis is present. M0 No evidence of distant metastasis M1 Distant metastasis |
SNOMED CT has content related to the AJCC T category under the hierarchy of 385356007 'Tumor stage finding' but it is outdated and inaccurate. SNOMED CT codes do not always make a distinction between clinical and pathological classifications (e.g. cT1 and pT1) and are represented by the same SNOMED CT code 23351008 'T1 category'). SNOMED CT does not have complete T,N,M staging terminology and is an incomplete data set. Most importantly, the SNOMED structure is not a good fit for the AJCC data elements that can change as new editions/versions of the AJCC Cancer Staging System are published. However, the AJCC is planning on submitting the data elements to the National Library of Medicine’s Value Set Authority Center (VSAC), in parallel to the submission to USCDI. The AJCC feels that VSAC would be an appropriate centralized repository for AJCC data elements. This would facilitate EHR systems' use of the data elements that the AJCC develops and maintains. |
Martin Madera | American College of Surgeons | ||
Level 0 | Social Determinants of Health | Food Insecurity | Uncertain, limited, or unstable access to food that is: adequate in quantity and in nutritional quality; culturally acceptable; safe and acquired in socially acceptable ways. (Gravity Project.) |
Yes, a vocabulary/terminology standard and/or technical specification exists for each proposed data element. The Gravity Project attaches a letter with an overview. For (1) Food Insecurity: LOINC, SNOMED-CT, ICD-10-CM, and CPT/HCPCS terminologies are specified by value set in NLM’s Value Set Authority Center (VSAC). For (2) Housing Instability and Homelessness, (3) Inadequate Housing, (4) Transportation Insecurity, (5), Financial Strain, (6) Social Isolation, (7) Stress, (8) Interpersonal Violence, (9) Education, (10) Employment, and (11) Veteran Status: • The corresponding value sets are under development by the Gravity Project; • The value sets will be complete prior to publishing of USCDI v2.0; • Even if a particular value set might be incomplete, the value set will be citable. The technical specifications for value sets under each data element are described below: • Assessments: LOINC • Health Concerns/Problems/Diagnoses: SNOMED-CT, ICD-10-CM • Goals: LOINC • Procedures/Interventions: SNOMED-CT (clinical), CPT/HCPCS (billing) • Outcomes: LOINC (NCQA measures) • Consent (where needed): based on existing HL7 code systems |
Mark Savage for Gravity Project | Gravity Project |