Non-imaging and non-laboratory tests performed that result in structured or unstructured findings specific to the patient to facilitate the diagnosis and management of conditions.
The name of the non-imaging or non-laboratory test performed on a patient.
Submitted By: Joel Andress
/ Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Center for Clinical Standards and Quality (CCSQ)
Data Element Information
Use Case Description(s)
Use Case Description
Diagnostic studies and exams performed with results are key data elements currently used in CMS eCQMs across hospital and clinician reporting programs. These data are necessary to confirm appropriate care is received for patients across different populations. Similar to labs and vital signs, it is clinically relevant from a care perspective and a quality measurement perspective to have access to and use diagnostic study/exam results for care decision making. This information can support surveillance of appropriate use and adherence to care guidelines for value-based care of patients.
Diagnostic study/exam concepts represented in measures include and eye/disc/macular exams and ejection fraction studies. Results for these types of studies and exams are available in structured fields and exchanged for quality measurement purposes.
Estimate the breadth of applicability of the use case(s) for this data element
1 million providers currently capture, access and exchange this diagnostic study/exam information. This information is currently electronically submitted by providers and hospitals to CMS for quality measurement purposes, including QPP.
eCQI resource center, includes measure specifications for CMS program eCQMs (i.e. CMS 143, 135): https://ecqi.healthit.gov/ecqms
Data exchange of diagnostic study/exam information is critical for clinical care. Clinician’s need to be aware of recent tests completed to both ensure the patient is receiving appropriate care and reduce duplicity which drives up healthcare costs.
Diagnostic study and exam information including studies/exams performed, result, and the type of test completed via standard terminology can be exchanged via C-CDA for patient care coordination.
Estimate the breadth of applicability of the use case(s) for this data element
Majority or hospital and clinical providers are capturing, accessing and exchanging this information.
5 or more. This data element has been tested at scale between multiple different production environments to support the majority of anticipated stakeholders.
Restrictions on Standardization (e.g. proprietary code)
No challenges anticipated. This data is available in standard terminology that can be publicly accessed via the VSAC and HL7.
Restrictions on Use (e.g. licensing, user fees)
We are not aware of any restrictions.
Privacy and Security Concerns
This data, like any patient data should be exchanged securely. Current processes exist, governed by CMS and ONC, to securely transfer this data.
Estimate of Overall Burden
Diagnostic study and exam performance is regularly captured as part of EHR systems. Most hospitals, including critical access hospitals, and providers are already capturing and exchanging these data for quality measurement to CMS.
Some additional efforts may be necessary to build out Observation profile or additional resources in FHIR US Core Implementation Guide, though base resources exist in FHIR and profiles exist in QI Core Implementation Guide.
The Connected Health Initiative supports adding the Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code set to the applicable vocabulary standards for Clinical Tests – Clinical Tests, as the CPT code set contains numerous codes for non-imaging and non-laboratory clinical tests.
The Connected Health Initiative supports adding the Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code set to the Applicable Vocabulary Standards listed in Clinical Tests – Clinical Tests. The CPT code set contains numerous codes for non-imaging and non-laboratory clinical tests, including, but not limited to electroencephalography (EEG), echocardiography (EKG), cardiovascular and exercise stress tests, pulmonary function tests, electromyography (EMG), electroretinography (ERG), audiologic function tests, evoked potential tests, intraocular pressure measurement, visual acuity and function tests, allergy challenge tests, fetal monitoring, and sleep studies.
The AMA requests that the Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code set be added to the applicable vocabulary standards for Clinical Tests – Clinical Tests. The CPT code set contains numerous codes for non-imaging and non-laboratory clinical tests. (See our previous comment on 4/17/2023 for a list of clinical tests and additional information.) The following are research examples where EHR data, including CPT clinical test codes, were used for the data analysis.
Kadambi P, Hart KW, Adeoye OM, Lindsell CJ, Knight WA 4th. Electroencephalography findings in patients presenting to the ED for evaluation of seizures. Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Jan;33(1):100-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2014.10.041. Epub 2014 Oct 30. PMID: 25468214; PMCID: PMC4847441.
Floris-Moore M, Edmonds A, Napravnik S, Adimora AA. Computerized Adjudication of Coronary Heart Disease Events Using the Electronic Medical Record in HIV Clinical Research: Possibilities and Challenges Ahead. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2020 Apr;36(4):306-313. doi: 10.1089/AID.2019.0036. Epub 2019 Sep 10. PMID: 31407587; PMCID: PMC7185364.
Shin CH, Grabitz SD, Timm FP, Mueller N, Chhangani K, Ladha K, Devine S, Kurth T, Eikermann M. Development and validation of a Score for Preoperative Prediction of Obstructive Sleep Apnea (SPOSA) and its perioperative outcomes. BMC Anesthesiol. 2017 May 30;17(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12871-017-0361-z. PMID: 28558716; PMCID: PMC5450400.
The American Medical Association requests that the Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code set be added to the Applicable Vocabulary Standards listed in Clinical Tests – Clinical Tests. The CPT code set contains numerous codes for non-imaging and non-laboratory clinical tests, including, but not limited to electroencephalography (EEG), echocardiography (EKG), cardiovascular and exercise stress tests, pulmonary function tests, electromyography (EMG), electroretinography (ERG), audiologic function tests, evoked potential tests, intraocular pressure measurement, visual acuity and function tests, allergy challenge tests, fetal monitoring, and sleep studies. The CPT code set was added in 2022 to the Interoperability Standards Advisory (ISA) vocabulary list for Representing Non-Imaging and Non-Laboratory Clinical Tests. In a 2022 study, CPT was identified as an important component needed to study the value of certain clinical tests performed preoperatively before cataract surgery. (Harris AHS, Bowe T, Kamal RN, Sears ED, Hawn M, Eisenberg D, Finlay AK, Hagedorn HJ, Mudumbai S. Frequency and costs of low-value preoperative tests for patients undergoing low-risk procedures in the veterans health administration. Perioper Med (Lond). 2022 Sep 13;11(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s13741-022-00265-0. PMID: 36096937; PMCID: PMC9469517.) The CPT code set is a comprehensive and regularly curated uniform language that provides reliable communication among users. It has an extremely mature development process with open and transparent meetings and clinical input from national medical specialties and relevant stakeholders.
There was much interest from the Task Force in adding clinical variables beyond laboratory to USCDI. This is a suggested starting set. We would suggest that users would not be required to use these specific codes listed under a given panel verbatim. They could drop codes that did not fit and add other LOINC codes as appropriate. This starter set should get the ball rolling to deliver richer clinical data that has been available for years and is in high demand by clinicians and patients.
2021 03 29 Some clinical measure tests panels available from LOINC just some to explore.docx
CMS agrees with the need to make this additional clinical data available via inclusion in the USCDI. We agree LOINC terminology is an appropriate applicable standard to accompany the data element. CMS identified some critical diagnostic studies/exams including cardiac exams (ejection fraction from echocardiography tests), and colonoscopy; many of these align with the exams provided in this document.
There was much interest from the Task Force in adding clinical variables beyond laboratory to USCDI. This is a suggested starting set. We would suggest that users would not be required to use these specific codes listed under a given panel verbatim. They could drop codes that did not fit and add other LOINC codes as appropriate. This starter set should get the ball rolling to deliver richer clinical data that has been available for years and is in high demand by clinicians and patients.
The "Optional Background Text / Cover Letter" field provides space for additional context or introductory information related to your comment.
If you wish to provide context, explanation, or an introduction to your comment, enter this information in the field labeled "Optional Background Text / Cover Letter." This is entirely optional and is most useful when submitting multiple related comments or when additional background would help reviewers understand your feedback.
If you are only commenting on a single data class or element, you may leave this field blank.
2. Select the Data Class
To specify which data class your comment addresses:
In the "Data Class" drop-down menu, select the appropriate data class you want to comment on.
If you are providing a general comment that is not specific to a data element, select "General" from the options. Comments with this designation will be displayed on the USCDI landing page.
Note that the Data Class field will automatically populate based on your current location in the platform:
If you are on a data class page, the field will be set to that specific data class
If you are on a data element page, the corresponding data class will be pre-selected
3. Select the Data Element
To specify which data element your comment addresses:
In the "Data Element" drop-down menu, select the specific data element you want to comment on.
The drop-down menu will display only the elements available under the data class you selected in the previous step.
You can use the search function within the drop-down to quickly locate a specific data element.
If you are commenting on the data class itself rather than a specific element, you may leave this field blank.
Note: Comments on a specific data element will appear on the respective data element page, while comments on a data class (without a specific element selected) will appear on the landing page for that data class.
Fig 1 The "Data Class" and "Data Element" dropdown menus allow users to specify the exact content they wish to comment on.
4. Optional: Propose New Data Class or Element
If you cannot find the appropriate data class or element for your comment:
Instead of clicking the "Comment On An Existing Data Class Or Element" button, click the adjacent button labeled "Propose a New Data Class or Data Element."
This will redirect you to the ONDEC (ONC New Data Element and Class) Submission System.
In the ONDEC system, follow the provided instructions to submit your proposal for a new data class or element.
Once your proposal is submitted through ONDEC, it will be reviewed separately from the commenting process.
Fig 2 The "Propose a New Data Class or Data Element" button redirects users to the ONDEC Submission System for proposing new data elements not currently available in the system.
5. Complete the Comment Form
Fill out the required fields in the comment form:
Subject: Enter a brief, descriptive title that summarizes your comment. This helps reviewers quickly understand the nature of your feedback.
Comment: In this field, provide the full details of your comment or feedback. Be as clear and specific as possible about your suggestions, concerns, or observations. Include any relevant details that support your position.
6. Optional: Add Additional Comments
If you need to comment on multiple data classes or elements:
After completing your first comment, click the link labeled "Comment on another data element" at the bottom of the form.
A new comment section will appear, allowing you to enter details for your additional comment.
For each additional comment, you must select the appropriate data class and data element from the drop-down menus.
Complete the Subject and Comment fields for your additional comment.
Repeat this process for each additional comment you wish to submit.
Fig 3 The "Comment on another data element" link enables users to create multiple comments addressing different elements within a single submission.
7. Optional: Upload Supporting Files
The platform allows you to upload supporting documentation to enhance your comment:
Locate the "File Upload" section at the bottom of the comment form.
Click to upload any files (such as PDFs or documents) that provide additional context, evidence, or clarification for your comment.
Important: If you have already entered your comments using the form fields, there is no need to upload duplicate content in PDF format. The file upload feature is intended for supplementary materials only. Please avoid uploading files that contain the same information already provided in your comment text.
Fig 4 The "File Upload" section permits users to attach supporting documentation that supplements their written comments.
8. Optional: Save and Exit
If you need to pause your work and return to complete your comment later:
Click the "Save and Exit" button at the bottom of the form.
Your comment will be saved as a draft that you can access and complete later.
When you return to the platform, you will see a red triangle with an exclamation mark next to the “Return to saved Comment” button, indicating that you have saved comments in draft status.
Click this button to continue working on your draft.
You will be taken to a review page where you can:
Select "Submit Comment" to officially submit your feedback.
Click "Edit" to return to the comment form and make changes
Select "Discard Draft" to delete the saved draft and start fresh
Fig 5 A red triangle with exclamation mark indicator appears next to the “Return to saved Comment” button when draft comments are saved in the system.
9. Review and Submit
Once you have completed your comment:
Click the "Review and Submit" button at the bottom of the form.
This will take you to a review screen displaying your comment(s) in full.
Review all information for accuracy and completeness.
On this review screen, you have three options:
Click "Submit Comment" to officially submit your feedback
Click "Edit" to return to the comment form and make changes
Click "Discard Draft" to delete the comment and start fresh
The review screen also includes a "Print" button that allows you to create a printed copy of your comments for your records.
If you choose to submit, your comment will be recorded in the system and made available for review by the appropriate stakeholders.
Fig 6 The review screen allows users to verify comment content and make any necessary modifications before final submission.
Submitted by brianscarpelli on
Comments of the Connected Health Initiative
The Connected Health Initiative supports adding the Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code set to the applicable vocabulary standards for Clinical Tests – Clinical Tests, as the CPT code set contains numerous codes for non-imaging and non-laboratory clinical tests.