Description (*Please confirm or update this field for the new USCDI version*)
Sequence of characters representing a physical place of available services or resources.
Submitted By: Keith W. Boone
/ Audacious Inquiry
Data Element Information
Data Element Description
An identifier which uniquely identifies this facility.
Use Case Description(s)
Use Case Description
Facility level data is associated with laboratory tests (the testing facility), and health care provider locations, including hospitals, ambulatory providers, long-term and post acute care, and pharmacy providers.
Location data is used to support reporting of data for public health and emergency response (e.g., situation awareness reporting).
See https://build.fhir.org/ig/HL7/fhir-saner/ for details (note that (minus) - is a legal character in URLs, had to use a bit.ly link to get past validation errors in URL)
Estimate the breadth of applicability of the use case(s) for this data element
Hospitals in the US (Approximately 7000), Laboratories (260,000), pharmacies (88,000), ambulatory physicians (260,000).
5 or more. This data element has been tested at scale between multiple different production environments to support the majority of anticipated stakeholders.
Restrictions on Standardization (e.g. proprietary code)
None
Restrictions on Use (e.g. licensing, user fees)
None
Privacy and Security Concerns
Locations associated with Critical Access Hospitals, and single provider facilities may constitute PHI (in geographic locations with limited populations) and/or Individual Identifiable Information (e.g., for HCPs working from a combined home/office facility).
Estimate of Overall Burden
Most electronic systems provide the capacity to store location and organization information. Many EHRs already provide access to the Location resource via READ operations, some (e.g., Epic, AthentaHealth) provide search capabilities as well. This information is routinely communicated in HL7 V2 Messages, CDA Documents and some FHIR API transactions. To address gaps, implementers would need to modify interfaces (e.g., for CDA or HL7 V2), or add an endpoint. Estimated effort (based on past experience building EHR systems) is about one two-week sprint to implement the capability by a developer.
Other Implementation Challenges
Standards for location identifier may need flexibility depending on use of Location for reportiong, as there are a number of distinct location identifier systems which may be necessary for different reporting use cases. For example, CDC/NHSN assigns identifiers for HAI reporting, CLIA assigns identifiers to laboratories, CMS provides location identifiers, et cetera.
Recommendation: CMS CCSQ recommends further clarification to Facility Identifier’s description by including some examples, such as National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) Organization Identifier (OrgID).
Rationale: Including NHSN OrgID as an example will offer guidance on this data element’s use. Capturing this data is important for tracking patient safety outcomes associated with specific facilities and addresses. Additionally, it enables facilities within a given tax ID to be distinguishable from one another.
Recommendation: CMS CCSQ recommends further clarification to Facility Identifier’s description by including some examples, such as National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) Organization Identifier (OrgID).
CMS-CCSQ is pleased to see that Facility Identifier data element was added to USCDI v4. However, we recommend that the Facility Identifier data element be limited to capturing an individual facility instead of an organization or health system (with multiple facilities). We also recommend the NHSN OrgID be added to the Facility Identifier data element in addition to existing standards to capture individual facilities. This recommendation is a slight change from the CMS-CDC recommendation for draft USCDI v4 where NHSN OrgID was recommended under the Organization/Hospital Identifier. Additional discussion amongst CMS and CDC concluded that NHSN OrgID can more adequately capture an individual hospital or individual facility and that the CCN, which is currently in the Facility Identifier data element, is more appropriate as an organizational identifier.
NCPDP supports the use of the Type 2 NPI and recommends this to be added to the data elements. NCPDP recommends adding the following NCPDP SCRIPT Standard v2017071, NCPDP Specialized Standard v2017071 and NCPDP Telecommunication Standard Version D.0 as “Applicable Standard(s)”.
CAP Comment: The College of American Pathologists (CAP) supports this data element and finds that this element can capture the necessary information about Laboratory Address and Location. The CAP recommends that this data element should include identifier information number for facilities. If the facility type is a medical laboratory then a CLIA number should be used to unambiguously identify the laboratory.
Shared priority for CDC, CMS, and ASPR (via all hazards work with CDC)
Facility Identifier is necessary for measuring care delivered to inpatients and properly attributing that care. Facility identifier is critical for providing context for granular patient data and supports tracking data back to organizations, which ensures usability of interoperable clinical data. They can also support exchange of data between hospitals and post-acute care providers. All these activities are necessary for providing high quality care to patients, reducing healthcare inequities and disparities, and promoting interoperability and communication – all ONC stated priorities for the USCDI.
Facility identifiers have been identified as a joint CMS-CDC priority that are critical elements for public health reporting, surveillance, and emergency response (also ONC stated priority for USCDI v4).
CCN, PTAN, NPI, NHSN OrgID, and CLIA numbers are exchanged across the nation for CMS reporting to appropriately attribute outcomes and measure results. Organization identifiers are also used to support public health use cases, including electronic case reporting and emergency response activities proving applicability across multiple use cases. Accurate facility identifiers are essential to analyze facility level data and inform the allocation of resources such as therapeutics, supplies, staffing, and PPE to prepare for and respond to emergency events.
Facility names and addresses can be duplicative, so unique facility identifiers are critical to link facility-level primary key to link HAI data collected in NHSN to facility-level COVID-19 hospitalization data collected through the Unified Hospital Data Surveillance System. Linking these data systems is crucial for understanding the impact of COVID-19 on patient safety and other healthcare measures
The ISWG recommended this element for final USCDI v3, and received HITAC support, noting the need for an identifier combined with an assigning authority
Additional use cases:
COVID-19 hospital reporting
All hazards reporting
HAI
Patient safety quality measurement and public health surveillance via NHSN
Comments from NACCHO: NACCHO supports the inclusion of this data element; NACCHO recommends specifying which facility identifier should be used. Facilities could use multiple identifiers depending on the EHR system. A standard identifier should be used in this data element. Otherwise, an additional element should be added in Facility Information that indicates what identifier is used
Comments from CSTE: CSTE agrees with CDC's recommendation for this data element.
A facility, or organizational, identifier is critical for providing context for granular patient data and supports tracking data back to organizations—this type of contextual data element ensures usability of interoperable clinical data. Facility identifiers are used for billing, support data aggregation across sources, as well as attribution. They can also support exchange of data between hospitals and post-acute care providers. All of these activities are necessary for providing high quality care to patients, reducing healthcare inequities and disparities, and promoting interoperability and communication – all ONC stated priorities for the USCDI. Facility identifiers were also previously identified as a joint CMS-Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) priority as a critical element for public health reporting, surveillance and emergency response – an ONC stated priority for USCDI v4. For example, CDC and CMS rely on facility identifiers to measure the incidence of healthcare associated infections and other patient safety events in facilities, and to direct technical assistance and quality improvement support to underperforming facilities. Furthermore, the ISWG recommended this element for final USCDI v3, and received HITAC support, noting the need for an identifier combined with an assigning authority.
Maturity: This element is classified as Level 2 by ONC and continues to have strong standardization and be in wide use.
Current uses, exchange, and use cases: CCN, PTAN, NPI, and CLIA numbers are exchanged across the nation for CMS reporting to appropriately attribute outcomes and measure results. They are used extensively for electronic clinical quality measure (eCQM) reporting, linking data sources for quality measurement, and for post-acute care reporting and payment purposes. Facility identifiers are also used extensively for electronic case reporting (eCR) and electronic lab reporting (ELR) and are critical for public health agencies ability to monitor the spread of reportable conditions. Exchange of organization identifiers supports facility-specific quality, prior authorization activities, and other assessments that are limited without this information. Additionally, there is active work underway to create an IG for healthcare directories (HL7.FHIR.US.DIRECTORY-EXCHANGE\Home - FHIR v4.0.1) as part of the FAST Da Vinci accelerator initiative, which includes the critical organization and provider identifiers necessary to appropriately use and attribute exchanged data. Among other purposes, organization identifiers are also used to support public health use cases, including electronic case reporting and emergency response activities. For instance, during the early COVID-19 pandemic phase, there was insufficient data tracking across organizations, further complicated by the need to track emergency response resources across individual facilities. Exchange of facility/organization identifiers can mitigate such delays in emergency response activities.
The "Optional Background Text / Cover Letter" field provides space for additional context or introductory information related to your comment.
If you wish to provide context, explanation, or an introduction to your comment, enter this information in the field labeled "Optional Background Text / Cover Letter." This is entirely optional and is most useful when submitting multiple related comments or when additional background would help reviewers understand your feedback.
If you are only commenting on a single data class or element, you may leave this field blank.
2. Select the Data Class
To specify which data class your comment addresses:
In the "Data Class" drop-down menu, select the appropriate data class you want to comment on.
If you are providing a general comment that is not specific to a data element, select "General" from the options. Comments with this designation will be displayed on the USCDI landing page.
Note that the Data Class field will automatically populate based on your current location in the platform:
If you are on a data class page, the field will be set to that specific data class
If you are on a data element page, the corresponding data class will be pre-selected
3. Select the Data Element
To specify which data element your comment addresses:
In the "Data Element" drop-down menu, select the specific data element you want to comment on.
The drop-down menu will display only the elements available under the data class you selected in the previous step.
You can use the search function within the drop-down to quickly locate a specific data element.
If you are commenting on the data class itself rather than a specific element, you may leave this field blank.
Note: Comments on a specific data element will appear on the respective data element page, while comments on a data class (without a specific element selected) will appear on the landing page for that data class.
Fig 1 The "Data Class" and "Data Element" dropdown menus allow users to specify the exact content they wish to comment on.
4. Optional: Propose New Data Class or Element
If you cannot find the appropriate data class or element for your comment:
Instead of clicking the "Comment On An Existing Data Class Or Element" button, click the adjacent button labeled "Propose a New Data Class or Data Element."
This will redirect you to the ONDEC (ONC New Data Element and Class) Submission System.
In the ONDEC system, follow the provided instructions to submit your proposal for a new data class or element.
Once your proposal is submitted through ONDEC, it will be reviewed separately from the commenting process.
Fig 2 The "Propose a New Data Class or Data Element" button redirects users to the ONDEC Submission System for proposing new data elements not currently available in the system.
5. Complete the Comment Form
Fill out the required fields in the comment form:
Subject: Enter a brief, descriptive title that summarizes your comment. This helps reviewers quickly understand the nature of your feedback.
Comment: In this field, provide the full details of your comment or feedback. Be as clear and specific as possible about your suggestions, concerns, or observations. Include any relevant details that support your position.
6. Optional: Add Additional Comments
If you need to comment on multiple data classes or elements:
After completing your first comment, click the link labeled "Comment on another data element" at the bottom of the form.
A new comment section will appear, allowing you to enter details for your additional comment.
For each additional comment, you must select the appropriate data class and data element from the drop-down menus.
Complete the Subject and Comment fields for your additional comment.
Repeat this process for each additional comment you wish to submit.
Fig 3 The "Comment on another data element" link enables users to create multiple comments addressing different elements within a single submission.
7. Optional: Upload Supporting Files
The platform allows you to upload supporting documentation to enhance your comment:
Locate the "File Upload" section at the bottom of the comment form.
Click to upload any files (such as PDFs or documents) that provide additional context, evidence, or clarification for your comment.
Important: If you have already entered your comments using the form fields, there is no need to upload duplicate content in PDF format. The file upload feature is intended for supplementary materials only. Please avoid uploading files that contain the same information already provided in your comment text.
Fig 4 The "File Upload" section permits users to attach supporting documentation that supplements their written comments.
8. Optional: Save and Exit
If you need to pause your work and return to complete your comment later:
Click the "Save and Exit" button at the bottom of the form.
Your comment will be saved as a draft that you can access and complete later.
When you return to the platform, you will see a red triangle with an exclamation mark next to the “Return to saved Comment” button, indicating that you have saved comments in draft status.
Click this button to continue working on your draft.
You will be taken to a review page where you can:
Select "Submit Comment" to officially submit your feedback.
Click "Edit" to return to the comment form and make changes
Select "Discard Draft" to delete the saved draft and start fresh
Fig 5 A red triangle with exclamation mark indicator appears next to the “Return to saved Comment” button when draft comments are saved in the system.
9. Review and Submit
Once you have completed your comment:
Click the "Review and Submit" button at the bottom of the form.
This will take you to a review screen displaying your comment(s) in full.
Review all information for accuracy and completeness.
On this review screen, you have three options:
Click "Submit Comment" to officially submit your feedback
Click "Edit" to return to the comment form and make changes
Click "Discard Draft" to delete the comment and start fresh
The review screen also includes a "Print" button that allows you to create a printed copy of your comments for your records.
If you choose to submit, your comment will be recorded in the system and made available for review by the appropriate stakeholders.
Fig 6 The review screen allows users to verify comment content and make any necessary modifications before final submission.
Submitted by nedragarrett_CDC on
CDC's support for CMS comment for USCDI v7
CDC supports CMS CCSQ recommendation for clarification to Facility Identifier's description by adding some examples of which IDentiers can be used.