A person’s identification of their emotional, romantic, sexual, or affectional attraction to another person
Applicable Vocabulary Standard(s)
Applicable Standards
SNOMED International, Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine Clinical Terms (SNOMED CT®) U.S. Edition, March 2022 Release
Submitted By: A. Taylor
/ ONC
Data Element Information
Use Case Description(s)
Use Case Description
A user can record a patient’s sexual orientation according to HL7 Version 3 and SNOMED CT® codes. The user must be able to record whether the patient declined to specify sexual orientation. Note that while sexual orientation is included in this 2015 Edition “demographics” certification criterion and the 2015 Edition Base EHR definition, it is not included in the Common Clinical Data Set definition. This means that sexual orientation is not required to be exchanged using certain standards, only that systems enable a user to record sexual orientation. [see also 80 FR 62619]
We provide the following OID to assist developers in the proper identification and exchange of health information coded to certain vocabulary standards.
SNOMED CT® code system OID: 2.16.840.1.113883.6.96 [see also 80 FR 62612]
Health IT Modules can present for certification to a more recent version of the U.S. Edition of SNOMED CT® than the September 2015 version. [see also 80 FR 62612]
Estimated number of stakeholders capturing, accessing using or exchanging
Users of the 572 certified health IT products, out of 901 total products certified to ONC's 2015 Edition, that successfully tested to the 170.315(a)(5) demographics
certification criterion has the ability to record, change, and access gender identity data within these products.
This data element has been used at scale between multiple different production environments to support the majority of anticipated stakeholders
Number of organizations/individuals with which this data element has been electronically exchanged
N/A
Potential Challenges
Restrictions on Standardization (e.g. proprietary code)
While it is required under the 2015 Edition 170.315(a)(5) demographics certification criterion to be able to record, change, and access sexual orientation data, it is not required for exchange. One restriction may be the ability to restrict exchange based on patient consent by element.
Restrictions on Use (e.g. licensing, user fees)
None
Privacy and Security Concerns
None
Estimate of Overall Burden
Already implemented for record, change, and access, but not for exchange.
Collecting SO/GI data is essential to providing high-quality, patient-centered care for transgender people. ONC has provided good leadership on the standardization of this content in USCDIv2. FQHCs are required to collect these data for all their patients and report them to HRSA so these data are well established and are imperative to the patient-centered provision of care.
SO/GI data can be collected in several ways:
Information can be obtained through patient portals and transmitted to an individual’s EHR. This approach is attractive because it puts the patient in charge of defining their own identity and needs.
Questions can be included on registration forms for all patients as part of the demographic section along with information about race, ethnicity, and date of birth.
Providers and their care team can ask questions during the patient visit, for instance, as part of a social or sexual-history discussion.
To address the lack of SO/GI data in health systems, the Department of Health and Human Services’ (HHS’s) Healthy People 2020 included an objective to “increase the number of states, territories, and the District of Columbia that include questions that identify sexual orientation and gender identity on state level surveys or data systems” to improve “the health, safety, and well-being of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) individuals.” Increasing the number of population-based data systems that collect standardized data on (or for) lesbian, gay and bisexual populations and on (or for) transgender populations and expanding the availability of sexual orientation/gender identity (SO/GI) statistics have also been priorities for other federal agencies.
NACHC believes sexual orientation is a core component of many patients’ identities. However, it is also associated with serious health inequity and health disparities. Furthermore, it is clinically relevant to a number of domains of sexual health, trauma and interpersonal violence, substance abuse and mental health risk factors. Michigan students identifying as lesbian, gay, or bisexual reported higher rates than their peers for measures of bullying, missing school due to fear for their safety, and were more than three times as likely to report seriously considering suicide in the past year.
We strongly support the requirement for sexual orientation data to be captured in a standardized way in EHRs to support patients’ identities, reduce health disparities and facilitate effective clinical risk that may be modified by sexual orientation.
Subject: Additional values in the valuesetComments: Current sexual orientation values in USCDI v2 has ‘Something else, please describe’ which represents different sexual orientation categories that may have specific and different needs when compared to another distinct group with different sexual orientation. For example, as per USCDI v2, person with sexual orientation as ‘pansexual’ falls in the same group as person with e.g. ‘asexual’ as their orientation. These two groups may have completely different physical, social, emotional health needs which goes unnoticed in the current context of health equity.
The sexual orientation valueset being proposed is as follows:
Addressing health equity tasks through the USCDI in a scope of the SOGI, the USCDI should contain 5 data elements (Gender Identity, Sex assigned at birth, Sexual Orientation, Sex for Clinical Use Note and Patient Pronoun). The last two mentioned data elements were not included into the v.3. We recommend including the Sex for Clinical Use Note (within the Clinical Notes data class) and Patient Pronoun (within the Patient Demographic) into the next, the USCDI v.4 version.
We are proposing adding to the USCDI v.3 a LOINC code for the question as the following: 76690-7, Sexual orientation.
CSTE Comment:
CSTE recommends that strong consideration be given to employing the sexual orientation value set put forward by the HL7 gender harmony project - which include lesbian, gay or homosexual; straight or heterosexual; bisexual; asexual; exploring or questioning sexual orientation; something not listed (specify); choose not to disclose; and unknown.
I agree with the comment by Ravi.kafle; It is better to expand options to accurately capture and destigmatize other sexualities. The new values being proposed by them appear a marked improvement.
Current sexual orientation values in USCDI v2 has ‘Something else, please describe’ which represents different sexual orientation categories that may have specific and different needs when compared to another distinct group with different sexual orientation. For example, as per USCDI v2, person with sexual orientation as ‘pansexual’ falls in the same group as person with e.g. ‘asexual’ as their orientation. These two groups may have completely different physical, social, emotional health needs which goes unnoticed in the current context of health equity.
The sexual orientation valueset being proposed is as follows:
The NY eHealth Collaborative (NYeC) supports including sexual orientation in the USCDI v2 due to its widespread use and clinical value for LGBTQIA individuals. We suggest revising the element description to refer to the Lamda Legal definition: "People’s sexual attraction to same or different-sex people."
Submitted by nedragarrett_CDC on 2022-04-29
Additional Supporting Documentation for CDC's SOGI Submission
Please see the attachedONC Letter of Comment for SOGI v3_0.docx