<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: EHR Interoperability: The Structured Data Capture Initiative</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.healthit.gov/buzz-blog/electronic-health-and-medical-records/ehr-interoperability-structured-data-capture-initiative/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.healthit.gov/buzz-blog/electronic-health-and-medical-records/ehr-interoperability-structured-data-capture-initiative/</link>
	<description>The Latest on Health Information Technology from ONC</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 19:05:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrienne Tannenbaum</title>
		<link>http://www.healthit.gov/buzz-blog/electronic-health-and-medical-records/ehr-interoperability-structured-data-capture-initiative/#comment-325460</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrienne Tannenbaum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 17:01:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.healthit.gov/buzz-blog/?p=4152#comment-325460</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you, thank you, thank you.  I I am very excited that the US govt is now the place with the power to deploy standardization as a way of integrating data so that it can be &quot;shared&quot;, and the healthcare industry is the beneficiary that will be impacted almost immediately.  I am looking forward to an organized approach that will begin here, but expand to other areas outside of healthcare.

Please see my linkedin profile.  It points to many (what I consider to be) OLD publications which have been pointing out where &quot;metadata&quot; ties all of this together.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, thank you, thank you.  I I am very excited that the US govt is now the place with the power to deploy standardization as a way of integrating data so that it can be &#8220;shared&#8221;, and the healthcare industry is the beneficiary that will be impacted almost immediately.  I am looking forward to an organized approach that will begin here, but expand to other areas outside of healthcare.</p>
<p>Please see my linkedin profile.  It points to many (what I consider to be) OLD publications which have been pointing out where &#8220;metadata&#8221; ties all of this together.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Barry Robson</title>
		<link>http://www.healthit.gov/buzz-blog/electronic-health-and-medical-records/ehr-interoperability-structured-data-capture-initiative/#comment-320293</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Barry Robson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 21:26:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.healthit.gov/buzz-blog/?p=4152#comment-320293</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As an e-epidemiologist data mining medical records for epidemiological and EBM/CER metrics and probabilistic CDS rules, I&#039;m dubious that a further structuralizing Event-Attribute-Value type of layer will allow us to tackle and respond fast to say 250 million EHRs, and changing constantly with the wanted data  rather spread around the XML.   That is certainly more of a problem if access, as it ideally ethically should do, captures some spirit of fine grained consent where the patient dictates by notification, observation by observation etc  in the EHR, what can and can and cannot be available for access and to whom, with what resolution of value and timestamp, and what combinations.  I retired moderately recently as CSO IBM Global Healthcare Pharmaceutical and Life Sciences, and whilst these views are certainly mine and not necessarily IBM’s, I don’t see much in my personal experience there,  nor in my current job as an epidemiologist,  to alleviate these concerns as the EHR  stands at present.   As an epidemiologist I would of course be very happy to be proven wrong.
My views on how to tackle this, and experiments with a pro-PCAST style of approach, can be seen in the following recording  of the Johns Hopkins Grand Rounds Lecture that I gave on Feb 2 2013:-
http://webcast.jhu.edu/Mediasite/Play/80245ac77f9d4fe0a2a2bbf300caa8be1d]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As an e-epidemiologist data mining medical records for epidemiological and EBM/CER metrics and probabilistic CDS rules, I&#8217;m dubious that a further structuralizing Event-Attribute-Value type of layer will allow us to tackle and respond fast to say 250 million EHRs, and changing constantly with the wanted data  rather spread around the XML.   That is certainly more of a problem if access, as it ideally ethically should do, captures some spirit of fine grained consent where the patient dictates by notification, observation by observation etc  in the EHR, what can and can and cannot be available for access and to whom, with what resolution of value and timestamp, and what combinations.  I retired moderately recently as CSO IBM Global Healthcare Pharmaceutical and Life Sciences, and whilst these views are certainly mine and not necessarily IBM’s, I don’t see much in my personal experience there,  nor in my current job as an epidemiologist,  to alleviate these concerns as the EHR  stands at present.   As an epidemiologist I would of course be very happy to be proven wrong.<br />
My views on how to tackle this, and experiments with a pro-PCAST style of approach, can be seen in the following recording  of the Johns Hopkins Grand Rounds Lecture that I gave on Feb 2 2013:-<br />
<a href="http://webcast.jhu.edu/Mediasite/Play/80245ac77f9d4fe0a2a2bbf300caa8be1d" rel="nofollow">http://webcast.jhu.edu/Mediasite/Play/80245ac77f9d4fe0a2a2bbf300caa8be1d</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick van Terheyden, MD</title>
		<link>http://www.healthit.gov/buzz-blog/electronic-health-and-medical-records/ehr-interoperability-structured-data-capture-initiative/#comment-317478</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick van Terheyden, MD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 19:44:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.healthit.gov/buzz-blog/?p=4152#comment-317478</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting outline on structured data entry and capturing this using standard templates that are pre-populated - that&#039;s dead on (how often does the family history change in a clinical note...?)
What I don&#039;t see but believe will be central to capturing this information without burdening the physician with additional administrative tasks that detract from their focus on the patient is Natural Language Processing or as we call it Clinical Language Understanding (&lt;a&gt;CLU&lt;/a&gt;)
We like narrative because it captures all the information and leaves nothing out - technology is able to convert this into structured data, today we can do some elements really well at an accuracy in excess of 90%. This could flow seamlessly into the S&amp;I framework creating structured data for sharing that is tagged against the relevant controlled medical vocabulary. This data is readily available for registries, quality reporting etc, but more importantly it provides a level of granularity on clinical information that can be used for multiple other purposes especially verifying the delivery of high quality care.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting outline on structured data entry and capturing this using standard templates that are pre-populated &#8211; that&#8217;s dead on (how often does the family history change in a clinical note&#8230;?)<br />
What I don&#8217;t see but believe will be central to capturing this information without burdening the physician with additional administrative tasks that detract from their focus on the patient is Natural Language Processing or as we call it Clinical Language Understanding (<a>CLU</a>)<br />
We like narrative because it captures all the information and leaves nothing out &#8211; technology is able to convert this into structured data, today we can do some elements really well at an accuracy in excess of 90%. This could flow seamlessly into the S&amp;I framework creating structured data for sharing that is tagged against the relevant controlled medical vocabulary. This data is readily available for registries, quality reporting etc, but more importantly it provides a level of granularity on clinical information that can be used for multiple other purposes especially verifying the delivery of high quality care.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

 Served from: www.healthit.gov @ 2013-05-21 09:01:09 by W3 Total Cache -->